If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If he had executed the move properly the move would be effective against someone going for your legs.
And just how would it be "properly" done? And have you ever done such a thing against an actual shot (not from some bum or some eyes-closed dojo diver) successfully?
And just how would it be "properly" done? And have you ever done such a thing against an actual shot (not from some bum or some eyes-closed dojo diver) successfully?
I've already explained that I was a wrestler in school, and it's a technique that was taught to us. And yes, I've been both successful and unsuccessful using it.
Properly done you would have to move you legs back out of the way, get your hands between his guard and hook one or both of his arms. One arm to roll him and both arms to collapse his structure. At least in theory. Like I said, doesn't always work, especially against someone with lots of experience, but even when it doesn't it can still help to keep you on your feet.
Still not understanding your level of animosity, but to each his own, I guess.
Maybe the problem is what you are using as your example. How about a vid of what you are really talking about? Then we can compare and see if they are really the same thing.
I've already explained that I was a wrestler in school, and it's a technique that was taught to us. And yes, I've been both successful and unsuccessful using it.
Properly done you would have to move you legs back out of the way, get your hands between his guard and hook one or both of his arms. One arm to roll him and both arms to collapse his structure. At least in theory. Like I said, doesn't always work, especially against someone with lots of experience, but even when it doesn't it can still help to keep you on your feet.
Still not understanding your level of animosity, but to each his own, I guess.
dont sweat jubaji, nothing is indefensable, except whatever technique jubaji employs...his skill is so great, no one can overcome wrestling when he uses it...the art of wrestling isnt unbeatable, jubaji is
Maybe the problem is what you are using as your example. How about a vid of what you are really talking about? Then we can compare and see if they are really the same thing.
Maybe you just suck at explaining yourself.
Nah, that's not it. Purposely obtuse, yeah, that's it.
dont sweat jubaji, nothing is indefensable, except whatever technique jubaji employs...his skill is so great, no one can overcome wrestling when he uses it...the art of wrestling isnt unbeatable, jubaji is
Oh, I'm not. I fully understand the futility of it all. I'm just bored.
Well... First of all, that was the most pathetic double-leg ever executed on the internet... The second was on another WC sight. I think these WC guys outta learn wrestling before they invent counters for them.
Secondly, the counter was pathetic as well. I would wager that it wouldn't work 99.99% of the time against even a weak double-leg (the double-leg in the vid, as poor as it was, would have worked had the guy grabbed behind the legs).
Polecat, if indeed you wrestled then you would know the basic defenses:
1. Block with hands, elbows or forearms
2. Sprawl
3. Wizzer
Others include the cross face, slide down or go behind. When you understand the principles of these movements, then you can use attacks in conjunction. For instance, blocking a shot and following up with a knee, etc...
Polecat, if indeed you wrestled then you would know the basic defenses:
1. Block with hands, elbows or forearms
2. Sprawl
3. Wizzer
Others include the cross face, slide down or go behind. When you understand the principles of these movements, then you can use attacks in conjunction. For instance, blocking a shot and following up with a knee, etc...
Considering that I explained the sprawl combined with a block using the hands and hooking an elbow, I guess we're on the same page.
Comment