If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Funnytiger - you jumped into the middle of a post, stirred things up and directly insulted me. So whatever maturity level I have won't change the fact that you will have your ass handed to you
[" And although we may do our best to avoid trouble, sometimes trouble insists on finding us. When that happens......when the time for talk is over, warriors act. They flip the switch and act decisively - ruthlessly if necessary - to preserve and defend the things that they hold dear." Michael D. Janiich Why being a warrior starts with accepting the limitations of peace.
Well after flicking through this thread i have come across so much BULLSHIT eg Chinese Jujitsu and good work to all the members who slated the people for typing it.
First of all i would like to say that title "why no kung fu art can defeat mma" is stupid. For the creator of this topic MMA stands for Mixed Martial Arts therefore it is possble that some MMA fighters may even train in chinese martial arts and they beat each other. Also you seem to create the impression that you think MMA is a single martial art style well ......
YOU ARE WRONG
MMA is a group of styles that have all been utilised to gather fighting skills that can be practically used in a cage fight. These skills are taken from a wide variety of arts - Jujitsu,Judo,Karate,Kung Fu etc
[" And although we may do our best to avoid trouble, sometimes trouble insists on finding us. When that happens......when the time for talk is over, warriors act. They flip the switch and act decisively - ruthlessly if necessary - to preserve and defend the things that they hold dear." Michael D. Janiich Why being a warrior starts with accepting the limitations of peace.
HELLO!!!!! McFly..........Anybody home.........
The thread poses the question based on the assumption that A traditionalist will use only his traditional style against A mixed bag of tricks.
........................
MMA is a group of styles that have all been utilised to gather fighting skills that can be practically used in a cage fight. These skills are taken from a wide variety of arts - Jujitsu,Judo,Karate,Kung Fu etc
Suhieb
Lets not go crazy, the group of styles that makes up the sport of MMA is Muay thai, Boxing, wrestling, Judo/sambo/Brazilian Jiu Jitsu. Ofcoarse each fighter may have some other martial arts background but those are the core arts/combat sports that are needed to be trained
At the end of the day you can use anything in MMA, but there are those who believe that their style can cover all bases.
I spend a lot of time on wing chun forums arguing with practitioners who won't accept that wing chun alone won't survive in cages.
Kung fu is really designed to fight other kung fu styles. Wing chun tried to break the mold/mould, but even Bruce Lee found that his wing chun wasn't a perfect art when he travelled to America
No art is 'complete' although I find that wing chun comes very close, ie you can fight short range, clinch and even long range if you adjust the style a bit. But there are holes - groundwork for example
I think martial artists have to accept that their art would be a whole lot more better if they understood/knew other arts. I have done a few martial arts that I don't always practice but understanding them has helped me further my wing chun/grappling/muay thai.
If you had read the post, my comment was not meant as a general statement
Wing Chun is not complete. It comes close because it works long range short range, includes punching (palming, chops etc), kicking, clinchwork, forms, weapons the whole lot.
Arts like Muay Thai come close as well.
That is what the statement means. But you are too arrogant to understand that. Anything wing chun related must be bad according to you.
I have never gone onto any site and made a general statement that an art is crap because I know that even the ones that I am not keen on (Tae Kwon Do) can be good
I'm sure one day someone will get through to you that prejudices are never productive
What I love about Garland, is that even though he is a young, next generation guy-he speaks better English then most people my own age.
"Irregardless" is not a word, and never was!
And another thing that bothers me is when people say "off of", as in "I had to take this hat off of my head".
The correct English would be " I had to take this hat off my head"
....................
And back to the actual topic about Kung Fu vs MMA fighters......
I think that it is an unfair comparison to pit a practitioner of 1 martial art eg Kung Fu against and MMA fighter who trains in a variety of Martial Arts and then "brag" how Kung Fu cant beat it
Last edited by suhieb; 06-11-2007, 09:22 AM.
Reason: Spelling mistake ....
This comes back to whole debate about what would win in a fight - Bear or a shark. You can't truly know because they fight in different environments under different conditions. I have known kung fu practitioners to destroy MMA guys and I have seen other MMA guys destroy kung fu guys.
It depends a lot on the individual, their size, the length of time they have trained etc
It was claimed that Yip Man was once one of the best street fighters in the world. Bruce Lee was a pure kung fu practitioner before he came to the States.
I know there is a lot of mythology around these two individuals, but I think people are underestimating kung fu completely.
MMA practitioners (especially professionals) spend most of their time training to hit and kick or submit people. A lot of kung fu artists don't. There are a few exceptions within kung fu (wing chun, preying mantis) which are explosive and dangerous even to an MMA guy
Comment