Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

dangers of flakey teachers and the rise of internet fu

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by sunwukung View Post
    Put it this way, say I went to a boxing class, and the teacher showed the boxing techniques, but then refused to demonstrate them in the ring, I'd be very wary of trusting this teacher. For the same reason, I'm very wary of trusting what you have to say. This is partly because, despite it's vast repertoire of techniques, there are virtually no traditionalists who succeed in MMA competition (let alone enter one).
    By the way, I have seen my one of my instructors fight very powerfully in combat and he also fought on the ground. He often demonstrated the techniques he taught. And we would often spar very hard and aggressive, on hard floors. There was no play fighting or rehersed fighting, except for two man techniques.

    I also demonstrate the techniques I teach. Even tonight, when I taught a class, I had my students attack me fast and without rehersing it. When they see that I can counter their attacks they know that what I teach works. This is often how I teach.


    But as far as Kung Fu men entering MMA competitions, you won't find many Kung Fu men entering Judo competitions either or boxing competitions. The whole set up is different, different rules and styles etc.


    Originally posted by sunwukung View Post
    The simple truth is they haven't seen a kung fu master walk into a ring and defeat an opponent in the classic kung fu fashion,
    Well, like I said, its the forum and rules and whole set up that hinders Kung Fu application. Besides, I personally have no interest in picking fights for this purpose, I only teach my students to fight for defense and helping others, not for vainglory or in a scrapping situation. I know that may seem like a cop out, but to me it isn't. If they want ti test out their techniques they can do it in the club. Also, thee may be many schools that will not try to their techniques out against other schools, they don't just go around challenging the masters etc.



    Originally posted by sunwukung View Post
    As a result, a lot of people learn kung fu in a weak and compliant, drilled environment, and so it becomes diluted and untested, theoretical not practical.
    Well, thats not the way I learned. I am thankful for the invention of groin cups during those years. But I still had the wind knocked out of me at times and other things. There are many Kung Fu schools that have full contact sparing and are very aggressive in their training.

    Originally posted by sunwukung View Post
    In contrast, traditions like ...Boxing... are taught full contact and so their arts are kept lively and useful.
    Even boxers wear the large gloves and don't kick in the vitals or have many , many , many other moves that kung Fu fighters have. In fact there are only a handful of techniques in boxing, all of which are covered in some for in Kung Fu, and kung Fu adds many , many more techniques and counters to the arsenal. In Boxing, there are so many things that you cannot do. Why, even a quick snap kick to the groin is illegal. And yet that is basic in kung Fu, or a double swinging type strike where the guard is taken down by the leading hand and the other hand follow through and strikes behind the head. these type of powerful striking motions are not allowed in Boxing and can really damage the opponent. In kung Fu we also have to learn to "pull our strikes, so as not to seriously hurt the opponent. There is a great difference in fighting Kung Fu than Boxing or judo etc.

    This is why, even in sparing Kung Fu practitioners ned to demonstrate control and pull their techniques. Imagine a full contact kung Fu fight where there is no pulling of techniques and it is all out full contact. You would have broken knee joints, broken arms, necks, eye gouges, crushed groins, hard leopard strikes to the throat, broken ribs, spine, fingers etc. And yes, Kung Fu is that dangerous. I don't care what some say when I mention this. There are reasons we cannot fight full contact with Kung Fu techniques. yes we can hand have sparred with gloves on also and head gear and foot protection etc. But this kind of sparing many Kung Fu clubs have, it is full contact to a degree. but it still limits the use of many kung fu techniques. So real full contact Kung Fu fighting without gloves, or groin cups, or head gear or foot gear, would be unreasonable for sparring.

    Originally posted by sunwukung View Post
    The truth is that most people who learn self defense in a non competitive environment don't want to get hit, and are inevitably weaker fighters than those that are willing to endure that kind of pain in pursuit of skill.
    No, the truth is that they don't want to get killed. But the way I learned, we still got hurt often and we did spar very hard and it even went to the ground at times.

    But, just because we need to spar with discipline and pull our techniques and even wear protective gear at times, does not mean that the Kung Fu won't work. I think that is an unwise assumption that some might make.

    Comment


    • TC, I have some e-books. The originals were written a long time ago. They show boxing with throws. If you'd like PM me your email address and I'll send them to you. This is no joke.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by TigerClaw View Post
        And yet that is basic in kung Fu, or a double swinging type strike where the guard is taken down by the leading hand and the other hand follow through and strikes behind the head. these type of powerful striking motions are not allowed in Boxing and can really damage the opponent. In kung Fu we also have to learn to "pull our strikes, so as not to seriously hurt the opponent. There is a great difference in fighting Kung Fu than Boxing or judo etc.
        Maybe boxing, but what about karate, or jujitsu (where they apply locks in a full contact situation?) Is there really such a difference between SanShou or Lei Tai and any other competitive sparring? They don't appear to be injured in the way you describe - chin na techniques don't automatically break joints, so it should be possible to execute them in sparring.

        Originally posted by TigerClaw View Post
        we did spar very hard and it even went to the ground at times. But, just because we need to spar with discipline and pull our techniques and even wear protective gear at times, does not mean that the Kung Fu won't work. I think that is an unwise assumption that some might make.
        So then why don't you just do some of this hard sparring and demo some of your takedowns/getouts from grappling? As you yourself said, there are thousands of techniques, but you keep referring to vital strikes and eye gouges, can't you find anything in this limitless repertoire that can be used without maiming your sparring partner?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by sunwukung View Post
          So then why don't you just do some of this hard sparring and demo some of your takedowns/getouts from grappling?
          In Boxing and MMA fighting there are limited techniques that are used. I know some will take issue with this statement, but it is true. In boxing there are five moves or so, and in MMA there are a great many more. But all the techniques are limited to work in a full contact environment of a sport situation. It is easy to go full contact because these moves, and with the gloves on it is not as dangerous as the many kung fu moves without gloves. In Kung fu many of the techniques can only be done without gloves, such as grabbing, locking, or trapping arms, spearing techniques, clawing techniques locking the head, neck etc. Also there are many breaking techniques that are used in Kung Fu. If we strip out all the very dangerous techniques of kung fu then it would not be a good representation of a Kung Fu technique.

          So when doing sparing it is needful to PULL techniques (or to hold back the full contact strike), as I said before. If a Kung Fu man got into the ring with a MMA fighter, or a boxer he may get into a sprawling, grappling situation and quickly flare his fingers at the eyes of the opponent, or do a pheonix strike at his temple etc., but he would pull the technique or else serious injury would follow. The other fighter would not consider this a real attack, because he is unhurt, so he continues to grapple to the ground,[/COLOR] if he can, and as he does this the Kung Fu man locks his head and just slightly twist the neck, (pulling his technique so he does not break the neck), but the grappler does not feel the full contact and he is unhurt so he just keeps going on in his technique, then the Kung Fu man is on the ground and he sees a opening at the groin and he attacks there but pulls his technique so as not to seriously hurt the opponent, yet the grappler only recoils slightly at the attack and he is unhurt so he continues to attack. Then the Kung Fu man sees an opening at the throat and attack it, but pulls his clawing technique so as not to seriously hurt the grappler and the grappler does not feel hurt so he ignores it and attacks more, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc.

          So in this situation, we can see that the grappler would have been seriously hurt many times if not dead in combat. But because he did not feel the full force of the attack, he assumes it did not work on him and so he continues. That is sort of how things work out in real fighting full contact and real fighting sport . I understand that the fights are SPORT and not real life SURVIVAL COMBAT. But I think that is part of the problem. When you ask a combative fighter who thinks and trains for survival to forget all that and just jump into a totally different kind of fighting environment and fight SPORT fighting with many rules and restrictions, this is different.

          But against a grappler outside of the ring, many times the fight will not get to the ground as I believe. There are many Kung Fu techniques that are available from a stand up position. But if it does go to the ground, it depends on how skilled each person is in real combat situations. Not sport fighting, but combat fighting. many times it will be whoever can get to the vitals first, or the breaks etc.

          Originally posted by sunwukung View Post
          As you yourself said, there are thousands of techniques, but you keep referring to vital strikes and eye gouges, can't you find anything in this limitless repertoire that can be used without maiming your sparring partner?

          Against the average in experienced fighter/grappler a Kung Fu practitioner should have many resources to overcome him and the fight will not even go to the ground at times. But against a professional grappler who has perfected his grappling, that is where the many vital strikes come into play. Especially in a life threatening situation.

          Also, I have no desire to go and challenge other schools or MMA schools or karate schools. I am not like a some Bruce Lee character in the Chinese Connection where he goes into a karate schools or MMA schools and takes them all on. I am not concerned, threatened or bothered if others practice their own styles, thats good. And as far as comparing which style would work better, that really depends on the man in it, and how he has mastered his own body and techniques.

          Comment


          • Well I doubt you'll ever be able to do that, clown.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Middleweight View Post
              You are lucky that I am not a moderator

              Don't think I don't tell myself that everyday.






              Lighten up ol' fella, you'll get the idea soon enough.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by TigerClaw View Post

                Also, I have no desire to go and challenge other schools or MMA schools or karate schools. .

                I'm sure you don't, because you have no desire to have both your illusions and your ass broken.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by jubaji View Post
                  I'm sure you don't, because you have no desire to have both your illusions and your ass broken.
                  LOL it's funny because it's true.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by jubaji View Post
                    I'm sure you don't, because you have no desire to have both your illusions and your ass broken.
                    No, that has nothing to do with it. I am not concerned if I am better or worse than other fighters, I don't study martial arts for that reason. My intention is not for vain glory and ego. I study for the love of the art and self defense and to help others if needed.

                    To me fighting is the last resort, a soft answer, kindness, moral character patience and wisdom are all far more important in any situation than the fighting part.

                    Go talk to a good police officer and you should hear similar. But that does not mean they will not and cannot defend themselves and others very well.

                    And, by the way I have been smashed enough and hurt in my training, this is not a fear for me.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by TigerClaw View Post
                      No, that has nothing to do with it.


                      I believe you thiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiis much.

                      Comment


                      • Okay who the HELL was it who gave me negative rep for thinking something was funny???
                        I CAN THINK WHAT EVER the H@LL I WANT TO THINK IS FUNNY! There no yes or no to whether I think it funny!!!

                        Comment


                        • What did you think was funny???

                          Comment


                          • It was probably TigerClaw.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X