Created account just to settle this debate with a nifty video from the future of youtuber Master Wong teaching "how to use Chi Sao in Street Fight".
Basically it's a subconscious application of the concepts and of course doesn't mean you'll go into a fight with your arms extended out or that you'll stay square in front of them the entire fight. Watch the video!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
An answer to Chi Sao's usefulness
Collapse
X
-
how to use Wing Chun Chi Sao in Street Fight Subscribe for more videos, click here: https://www.youtube.com/user/138mws Master Wong makes it clearly that you...
-
Originally posted by pstevens View PostExactly, chi sau assumes you have contact with your arms. In fact, chi sau begins with arms touching, correct? But this isn’t the problem. The problem as I’ve said is RANGE. Within chi sau range, you are at a great… let me repeat, great disadvantage unless you’ve done one of two things:
1. Closed the gap and controlled your opponent; the clinch.
2. Slipped inside/outside to throw combinations.
this is soemthing that most schools (in the writers opinion and mine too) do not train. they train a lot of chi sau with the arms already touching so from that alone students cannot apply it in live situations
Leave a comment:
-
Man, that's harsh! Chi Sau teaches sensitivity and the use of the 3 tools as mentioned above. So as soon as my arm makes contact with yours that is Chi Sau. For example if you throw a straight punch and I deflect it using Tan Sau and then change to Laap Sau using the same hand that is a very basic form of trapping a single hand. I could go into many examples, but I won't. But that is Chi Sau, not just the exercise you see, but the sensitivity that comes along with the training.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pstevens View PostWell, it's also quite evident you don't know a damn thing about MMA or WC for that matter; since you haven't been able to dispute anything I've said.Multiple people explained it but it's still too complicated for you to grasp.
Originally posted by pstevens View PostHere you go again with more false assumptions. I really hope you're not an adult, because your childish antics are really apparent. Anyone who reads this entire wasted thread will see that I've tried to justify my argument while you pretended to be a kung-fu expert.
Originally posted by pstevens View PostEither way, you need to grow up and I need to get out of this pointless debate.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TTEscrima View PostHe's working from multiple flawed premises, brought on by the fact he doesn't know a damn thing about WC training except he's certain what they do it all wrong.:
Originally posted by TTEscrima View PostIt's simple really, it isn't MMA therefore it's wrong.
Either way, you need to grow up and I need to get out of this pointless debate.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mellow View PostYou're working from the premise that WC is only chi sau. Chi sau is only an exercise to develop attributes used in WC. It's only a small part of the whole system.It's simple really, it isn't MMA therefore it's wrong.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pstevens View PostGood boy, at least you understand the principle now. Royler was limited to his one range; just as chi sau is limited to its range. Both are a recipe for disaster.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TTEscrima View Post…chi Sau is about sensing and countering attacks at a specific range.:
Originally posted by TTEscrima View Post…In BJJ both partners start out on the ground or on their knees where NO fights begin. I don't see you whining about that and declaring it doesn't work that way in sparring or fighting..:
Either way, I don’t see how this is relevant at all. We’re not talking about BJJ are we? Furthermore, I’ve never stated that BJJ had every answer… I know BJJ has bad training habits that wouldn’t apply to real combat situations. I can admit that…
Originally posted by TTEscrima View Post…Ever watched Royler butt scoot around on the mat instead of getting up to fight Sak? He butt scooted over 50% of the fight... guess he was practicing what he preached eh?.:
Originally posted by TTEscrima View Post…Apparently his training emphasizing one range limited his ability to actually put an opponent on the ground and required him to lay there begging Sak to come down.:
Originally posted by TTEscrima View Post…SOME people are bright enough to grasp a tool has certain uses, some people are just tools.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mellow View PostCan you elaborate on this a bit? I think this will throw alot of people off.
Because fights happen in split seconds there would be no way to think your way through the many possible combinations to deal with your attacker and this is where Chi Sap (energy sensing) drills come in. These drills teach the common applications of the forms by doing them with a partner. As progress is made mechanical reactions begin to occur in response to stimuli that the central nervous system recognizes. These mechanical reactions later turn into reflex actions as the body learns to sense and respond to attacking power by reflex making use of the techniques in the form.
The Chi Sap drills teach the usage of striking, chin-na and unrooting techniques by feel, much like a hand pulling away from a hot iron without the brain telling it to. The techniques are executed without the eyes seeing the incoming strike and trying to tell the brain about it which then decides which technique to respond with.
By the time all that went on the fight would be over, instead just like catching a ball thrown to you without calculating the speed and angle you simply catch it. It is the same thing that you learn to do when an opponent attempts to strike you the technique simply shoots out and intercepts the incoming strike just like catching the ball.
In simple terms, after making contact with the opponents limbs you can feel your opponents power and this allows you to respond quicker. As one hand hits it naturally reacts as the next strike begins to manifest, with experience you can not only sense that a strike is coming you can tell what type of punch, kick etc is manifesting by the way the opponents body moves (feels).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pstevens View PostI made this point very clear! I said chi sau is an "exercise." However, it teaches an unrealistic approach to RANGE. Please prove otherwise.
In BJJ both partners start out on the ground or on their knees where NO fights begin. I don't see you whining about that and declaring it doesn't work that way in sparring or fighting. Ever watched Royler butt scoot around on the mat instead of getting up to fight Sak? He butt scooted over 50% of the fight... guess he was practicing what he preached eh? Apparently his training emphasizing one range limited his ability to actually put an opponent on the ground and required him to lay there begging Sak to come down. SOME people are bright enough to grasp a tool has certain uses, some people are just tools.Last edited by TTEscrima; 03-12-2009, 05:26 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TTEscrima View PostWrong again. As anyone with any actual training understands Forms, drills, exercises etc develop skill sets and attributes to be used in combat, but you NEVER use the actual drill, form or exercise itself in combat. Yet you declare Chi Sau wasn't used on you in sparring as some sort of black mark against WC, when in fact it just shows your ignorance of the subject..
Originally posted by TTEscrima View PostSo now you're claiming your whole point was trapping doesn't work outside the WC school?.
Originally posted by TTEscrima View PostI believe even XF has commented on his own use of several WC trapping techniques in sparring.
The model of this debate:
My argument: From what I've seen, Chi sau trains within a range that is compromising. However, it's useful to train in all ranges.
Your defense: You don't know chi sau; chi sau is just an exercise. you can't use it to fight. You don't know kung-fu; MMA people are ignorant regarding kung-fu, so please don't try to help us.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pstevens View PostMy argument is that chi sao conditions one to remain within a mid-range for an unrealistic amount of time. I didn’t say it was completely useless in regards to combat; YOU DID! Your exact words were: “ITS NOT INTENDED FOR USE IN SPARRING OR COMBAT!!” Meaning it has no combat applications.
Originally posted by pstevens View PostExactly. I didn’t see any trapping, sensitivity to my attacks… As a matter of fact, I haven’t seen any of this stuff work outside of a WC gym. Please show or correct me if I’m wrong. I’d be willing retract my statement if you can show me a WC guy executing chi sau maneuvers/techniques/concepts while in-fighting against someone not WC.
I believe even XF has commented on his own use of several WC trapping techniques in sparring.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: