Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tai Chi,good self-defense art or not?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BoarSpear
    replied
    Originally posted by SamuraiGuy
    I'm sure he was the one who coined that phrase

    On another note, I wish I knew something about chinese MA so that I could take Boar or Jubaji's side and start arguing, but sadly I dont. Maybe I should go learn Tai Chi so I can knowledgeably argue about that too.
    Taiji also improves your range of subjects in which you can be a smartass huh? well sheeit there's another benifit

    Leave a comment:


  • SamuraiGuy
    replied
    Originally posted by Mephariel
    Exactly. Remember what Bruce Lee said:

    "The best defense is offense."
    I'm sure he was the one who coined that phrase

    On another note, I wish I knew something about chinese MA so that I could take Boar or Jubaji's side and start arguing, but sadly I dont. Maybe I should go learn Tai Chi so I can knowledgeably argue about that too.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mephariel
    replied
    Originally posted by BoarSpear
    sorry I havent got back to you on this, Ive been busy

    Thing is everytime I hear secret I roll my eyes, the ONLY secret is practice...the idea of passive or defensive aspect of internal arts is nonsense.
    you either bait the opponent or initiate the attack yourself, you dont dance around whirling your arms centering your breathing. you try to gain an advantageous angle with stepping as you move in flatten the opponent in the most efficent and effective way possible.

    The rest of those are good books but have nothing to do with taiji, it sounds like he was trying to instill the warrior aspect through something other than the arts he was teaching. It isnt easy to find warriorship or deep martial understanding in the written word...these things are best experienced, those books can give you a guideline though

    I recommend "living the Martial Way" by Forest Morgan
    it might give you a new perspective on the Arts and yourself.
    Exactly. Remember what Bruce Lee said:

    "The best defense is offense."

    Leave a comment:


  • BoarSpear
    replied
    Originally posted by treelizard
    Here it is...

    Book list from one instructor that he gave me when I asked a question in class about something he said that qi gong and weight lifting were not compatible. His response: look at the classic Chinese literature. The books he recommended were

    I Ching
    Tao Te Ching
    Tai Chi Classics
    Secrets of Wu Style Tai Chi

    From the taiji/qi gong master from Ohio, though these certainly aren't taiji classics (though that's what I asked for).

    Art of War
    Book of Five Rings
    Mao's little red book
    On War
    anything by Benny Urquidez

    He also keeps telling me to do aiki or wing chun and to play chess.
    sorry I havent got back to you on this, Ive been busy

    Thing is everytime I hear secret I roll my eyes, the ONLY secret is practice...the idea of passive or defensive aspect of internal arts is nonsense.
    you either bait the opponent or initiate the attack yourself, you dont dance around whirling your arms centering your breathing. you try to gain an advantageous angle with stepping as you move in flatten the opponent in the most efficent and effective way possible.

    The rest of those are good books but have nothing to do with taiji, it sounds like he was trying to instill the warrior aspect through something other than the arts he was teaching. It isnt easy to find warriorship or deep martial understanding in the written word...these things are best experienced, those books can give you a guideline though

    I recommend "living the Martial Way" by Forest Morgan
    it might give you a new perspective on the Arts and yourself.

    Leave a comment:


  • jubaji
    replied
    Originally posted by BoarforestofchickensSpear
    I'm ignoring your dumbass...

    Because you lack the ability and the courage to back up your fantasy-boy idiocy.

    You have nothing left to say, so you think that means you have nothing left to hear.

    Go on and pretend to run, we both know you are still reading this, you fraud.

    Leave a comment:


  • jubaji
    replied
    Originally posted by BoarSpear
    : the "most legitimate taiji master in the world" .

    Why are you quoting your own 2nd screen name? Be careful, you are losing more of your grip on reality.

    Leave a comment:


  • BoarSpear
    replied
    Originally posted by jubaji
    You'd better, braveheart. You're fast running out of ways to defend your fantasies and psychoses.
    So, did you practice the taiji you learned from the "most legitimate taiji master in the world" today?

    Run? from you? Hahahahaha another classic jubaji fantasy...no child, I'm ignoring your dumbass since I have wasted enough time on you already.

    Leave a comment:


  • jubaji
    replied
    not much more room to run away

    Originally posted by BoarforestSpear
    I can just put jubaji on ignore, I'm strongly considering it anyway.

    You'd better, braveheart. You're fast running out of ways to defend your fantasies and psychoses.

    Leave a comment:


  • BoarSpear
    replied
    Originally posted by treelizard
    Understood. Was writing mostly in response to Shard.

    I'm pretty familiar with how Western medicine ends up validating TCM over and over and over again, too. Find it useful to point that out to people. (Of course that has nothing to do with taiji...sorry. Carry on...)
    Smartass

    Each move in the Taiji form does contain a healing move, a strike, and a chin-na application. However if you try to apply the meridians, the elements and the Baqua triagrams with your taiji fighting applications, you're in for a rude awakening in a fight.

    If you wanna open another thread and discuss TCM/ meridain flows/non meridian TCM/dimmak I'm there I can just put jubaji on ignore, I'm strongly considering it anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • BoarSpear
    replied
    Originally posted by 7r14ngL3Ch0k3
    Duh, i was being sarcastic.
    Well hey, with your past post history..........

    Leave a comment:


  • treelizard
    replied
    Originally posted by kingoftheforest
    You're right you don't I didn't. But i'd think the people who developed and taught the system...well their input might be the ultimate source you want to check.
    Understood. Was writing mostly in response to Shard.

    I'm pretty familiar with how Western medicine ends up validating TCM over and over and over again, too. Find it useful to point that out to people. (Of course that has nothing to do with taiji...sorry. Carry on...)

    Leave a comment:


  • kingoftheforest
    replied
    Originally posted by treelizard
    You don't even have to go to Chinese masters for this if you don't want to

    You're right you don't I didn't. But i'd think the people who developed and taught the system...well their input might be the ultimate source you want to check.

    Leave a comment:


  • treelizard
    replied
    P.S. http://www.scheele.org/lee/classics.html

    Leave a comment:


  • treelizard
    replied
    Here it is...

    Book list from one instructor that he gave me when I asked a question in class about something he said that qi gong and weight lifting were not compatible. His response: look at the classic Chinese literature. The books he recommended were

    I Ching
    Tao Te Ching
    Tai Chi Classics
    Secrets of Wu Style Tai Chi

    From the taiji/qi gong master from Ohio, though these certainly aren't taiji classics (though that's what I asked for).

    Art of War
    Book of Five Rings
    Mao's little red book
    On War
    anything by Benny Urquidez

    He also keeps telling me to do aiki or wing chun and to play chess.

    Leave a comment:


  • 7r14ngL3Ch0k3
    replied
    Originally posted by BoarSpear
    Are you trying to be dense?
    Duh, i was being sarcastic.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X