Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tai Chi,good self-defense art or not?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • treelizard
    replied
    You don't even have to go to Chinese masters for this if you don't want to, just read about muscle memory, or better yet, observe a baby learning to walk, and then someone who has "practiced" walking a lot. The latter will use much less effort. It's all about the neural network and neuron/muscle pathways, etc.

    Now, if you've ever done elder care or worked with people who were bedridden, you will see that people who haven't walked for a long time have to relearn it. Why would it be any different for anything else?

    And as far as fighting, wouldn't that make the difference between just memorizing techniques and using them in the context for which they were intended? You can read about this in the book "On Combat," where Lt. Colonel Dave Grossman discusses how learning to shoot a weapon (for example) in a simulation needs to be used in real life at least once before you can transfer your training to reality. I forget the technical terms he used but it was in the chapter on video games. It is absolutely based on scientific and empirical evidence, not mumbo jumbo.

    Not that I am dissing Chinese masters!!

    Now if only I could find my booklist that my former taiji instructor had for me so Boar could rip it apart...searching through files...

    Leave a comment:


  • BoarSpear
    replied
    Originally posted by Shard
    I'm going to have to disagree to both points here...

    If you can't even fight in a place which ensures your safety and rules to prevent unnessary injuries, how can you even fight on the street. Over-dependence on eye gourges, head-butts and the infamous groin strikes are what gets people into trouble. But i do however agree, with the basic idea, that to be able to learn to fight, one has to fight.

    The second paragraph directly opposes the first. To get good at a technique, one must practise it many mant times, yes. But a fight is more than just good technique. Its good timing, distancing and so many other factors.
    Well YOU go ahead and disagree with one of most famous Chinese Masters and fighters, im sure everyone has way more respect for your opinions than his experiences. and accomplishments

    Leave a comment:


  • SamuraiGuy
    replied
    Originally posted by knifethrower
    No dude, this one had me on the floor
    But that one wasnt a joke!



    Leave a comment:


  • knifethrower
    replied
    Originally posted by SamuraiGuy
    Brilliance is lost on you people....

    (now that I think about it the PMS one wasnt that brilliant, BUT THE CHEESE ONE WAS!)
    No dude, this one had me on the floor

    Originally posted by SamuraiGuy
    I train Hip Hun Po Gar Kung fu....Im a 307th degree red striped night shade belt.

    Fear me.

    Leave a comment:


  • SamuraiGuy
    replied
    No one even noticed the PMS joke, I thought that was gold!

    This is like my very cheesy joke that went unnoticed... man that was a solid joke...

    Brilliance is lost on you people....

    (now that I think about it the PMS one wasnt that brilliant, BUT THE CHEESE ONE WAS!)

    Leave a comment:


  • Shard
    replied
    Originally posted by BoarSpear
    "The only way someone can learn how to become a good fighter is to fight on the street, down and dirty, no rule, no pads, full contact, full speed"

    "Forms are for demonstration and show. If you want to learn to fight, you practice one move thousands and thousands of times a day, everyday."

    ~Lui Wan Fu~
    I'm going to have to disagree to both points here...

    If you can't even fight in a place which ensures your safety and rules to prevent unnessary injuries, how can you even fight on the street. Over-dependence on eye gourges, head-butts and the infamous groin strikes are what gets people into trouble. But i do however agree, with the basic idea, that to be able to learn to fight, one has to fight.

    The second paragraph directly opposes the first. To get good at a technique, one must practise it many mant times, yes. But a fight is more than just good technique. Its good timing, distancing and so many other factors.

    Leave a comment:


  • BoarSpear
    replied
    Originally posted by treelizard
    I would love to! And also about avoiding the three injuries and about the eight trigrams... And how this fits into TCM (if it does) and its relationship to the Taoist classics (if any).
    Sorry but the triagrams and the Taoist Classics have little if anything to do with taiji. the majority of that nonsense got heaped onto the art by scholors who couldnt fight but really enjoyed sitting around drinking and talking about the arts...

    the Actual classics of Taiji were very concise...no nonsense and to the point, anyone can read the original classics in 5 minutes or less, now if you try to read all the BS the scholors piled on top you'll need about 3 lifetimes

    Leave a comment:


  • BoarSpear
    replied
    Originally posted by 7r14ngL3Ch0k3
    Nice, at least someone replied to my question which was probably one of the most important q's so far...
    Really? so are you packing your bags and headed out?

    Then check out these people...The chen lineage is one of many and what is and is not real Taiji is debated even among the clans who founded it

    Dr. Jacques Moramarco

    Xu Nai Yin

    Ma Jiangling

    If you're serious you can find what you need from there, if not you wont waste their time will you?

    Leave a comment:


  • treelizard
    replied
    Originally posted by BoarSpear
    The Nine Necessities, 1) Sink 2) Transversness 3) Lift 4) Nimbleness 5) Wrap 6) Straighten 7) Contract 8) Rise Drill 9) Fall and overturn.

    These are things on internal fighting styles from the old books on Martial arts, care to discuss them?
    I would love to! And also about avoiding the three injuries and about the eight trigrams... And how this fits into TCM (if it does) and its relationship to the Taoist classics (if any).

    Leave a comment:


  • BoarSpear
    replied
    Originally posted by 7r14ngL3Ch0k3
    Yeah, right. Like doing Kata
    Are you trying to be dense?

    Leave a comment:


  • BoarSpear
    replied
    The Nine Necessities, 1) Sink 2) Transversness 3) Lift 4) Nimbleness 5) Wrap 6) Straighten 7) Contract 8) Rise Drill 9) Fall and overturn.

    These are things on internal fighting styles from the old books on Martial arts, care to discuss them?

    Leave a comment:


  • 7r14ngL3Ch0k3
    replied
    Yeah, right. Like doing Kata

    Leave a comment:


  • BoarSpear
    replied
    Fill your note book with this

    Leave a comment:


  • BoarSpear
    replied
    Originally posted by treelizard
    Know the male,
    yet keep to the female:
    receive the world in your arms.
    If you receive the world,
    the Tao will never leave you
    and you will be like a little child.

    Oooooo Now i get it...Treelizard is out, but quotes from all the books non martial related are in...Get out of airy fairy land man..thats why you are so sensitive to chi...you are in fruitloop land!!! that has NOTHING to do with Taiji

    Leave a comment:


  • treelizard
    replied
    Originally posted by BoarSpear
    Yep, Female, and passive agressive
    Know the male,
    yet keep to the female:
    receive the world in your arms.
    If you receive the world,
    the Tao will never leave you
    and you will be like a little child.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X