Me and my friend decided we were gonna do some sparring. Me and him are about the same build. He's studies Wing Chun and has been for two years. I myself have been studying JKD for 6 weeks and did kickboxing for 2 years 5 years ago.
He would smack the hell out of me using his wing chun if I was to punch him etc. Too the main point, at the end of work me and him sparred. We were moving about waiting for an opening etc.......no contact had been made. At that point I decided to to just lunge in covering my head and hugged his waist and took him to the ground. He got me in a head lock as I lunged in but I locked his body to my body using the leg lock when we were on the ground. We grappled for a while and I almost got him into an armbar.
I learnt to take him down from an instructional video (Gracie Jui Jitsu) within 5 mins practicing on my brother. I also was practicing the armbar.
If he's been studying WC for two year and I've been studying the video for like 10mins, for me to take him down to the ground and grapple him kinda says something about grapplers. This may be a bold statement but I think I can truely say that a grappler will always win against a striker of the same skill. In a fight your aim is to beat the opponent whether on the ground or standing. In many threads on this forum there are post saying that BJJ has a disadvantage in stand up fighting, maybe so to you guys, it sounds like you guys dont like getting your clothes dirty because of the fact your grabbing your opponents body and taking him to the ground. I dont think that its even an issue saying that BJJ has a disadvantage in stand up fighting.
IMO study BJJ and WC.
If you dont like getting dirty on the ground use WC to trap the opponent but if you go to the ground you then apply BJJ. Simple as that.
Any ideas ?
He would smack the hell out of me using his wing chun if I was to punch him etc. Too the main point, at the end of work me and him sparred. We were moving about waiting for an opening etc.......no contact had been made. At that point I decided to to just lunge in covering my head and hugged his waist and took him to the ground. He got me in a head lock as I lunged in but I locked his body to my body using the leg lock when we were on the ground. We grappled for a while and I almost got him into an armbar.
I learnt to take him down from an instructional video (Gracie Jui Jitsu) within 5 mins practicing on my brother. I also was practicing the armbar.
If he's been studying WC for two year and I've been studying the video for like 10mins, for me to take him down to the ground and grapple him kinda says something about grapplers. This may be a bold statement but I think I can truely say that a grappler will always win against a striker of the same skill. In a fight your aim is to beat the opponent whether on the ground or standing. In many threads on this forum there are post saying that BJJ has a disadvantage in stand up fighting, maybe so to you guys, it sounds like you guys dont like getting your clothes dirty because of the fact your grabbing your opponents body and taking him to the ground. I dont think that its even an issue saying that BJJ has a disadvantage in stand up fighting.
IMO study BJJ and WC.
If you dont like getting dirty on the ground use WC to trap the opponent but if you go to the ground you then apply BJJ. Simple as that.
Any ideas ?
Comment