STEROIDS!?! How dangerous ARE they??

[DickHardman]

mr ass

badass billy gun talkin about roids in wrestling.


[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siuwQ7jtcn4[/YOUTUBE]

[blitz]

I actually laughed at the guy who wanted them to be the center of attention wtf... I mean the other had good bodies coming out of the roids, this guy had nothing, why on earth is he taking them again?

[DickHardman]

I actually laughed at the guy who wanted them to be the center of attention wtf... I mean the other had good bodies coming out of the roids, this guy had nothing, why on earth is he taking them again?

that guy was really dumb. he had no clue what he was doing. that guy didnt even really work out or diet. he was fcking clueless. he just thought taking the injection alone is all that was needed. notice how he said he lost all his gains. not only that, but the gains he made werent even that much for being on roids. what a douche. i wish we could see the rest of the documentary were it shows him getting out of control with the roids yet still not being big at all.


heres another clip were some guys advocate roids. they say that with proper knowledge and use they are actually good you healthy adult males. another interesting clip.

[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0LEj8IPHGU[/YOUTUBE]

[suhieb]

Here's my opinion...

You don't need them. You can get the same effects from the right diet and some some healthy legal supplement. Real roids would probably just speed up the process. And dangerously. You shouldn't take short cuts like that in my opinion....

I aggree with this statement - the steroids may help you achieve your goals faster but they may be dangeous - also if your looking to compete some MMA competions have a mandetory Drugs test that you must take to see if competitors are on any drugs

Suhieb

[fozzy40]

Just listened to a Sean Sherk interview which prompted this question. What is the reasoning behind athletes saying that they didn't know that they were taking steroids? Is it like they took a some "supplement" that their trainer said was "all-natural?"

[Ghost]

I aggree with this statement - the steroids may help you achieve your goals faster but they may be dangeous - also if your looking to compete some MMA competions have a mandetory Drugs test that you must take to see if competitors are on any drugs

Suhieb

Steroids take you beyond your natural limit, they dont just speed things up, they allow you to go way beyond your natural limit. it is therefore much harder to keep the gains that are got from using steroids. you cannot reach the same level naturally that you can on steroids.
steroids are safe and productive in the correct hands where the user knows what they are doing.

People should remember that steroids doesnt refer to one chemical, there are many different steroids which have different effects on the body for different purposes, the safety of each varies alot and the side effects vary.

[DickHardman]

just order a couple cycles of nandrolone/decadurabolin from a nice european pharmacy over the internet and you should be set.

[DickHardman]

Just listened to a Sean Sherk interview which prompted this question. What is the reasoning behind athletes saying that they didn't know that they were taking steroids? Is it like they took a some "supplement" that their trainer said was "all-natural?"

thats just the excuse they like to use when they dont have the balls to man up and admit they were caught juicing. they try to say a dr prescribed it and he didnt know it was a roid, or a trainer who really wanted him to do better slipped into his drink when he wasnt looking. all nonsense.

[J-Luck]

Steroids in low dosages are never dangerous, and only beneficial, for healthy, adult males. Now, with increase in dosage, health risks, and age risks, the probability of steroids becoming detrimental goes up.

Bodybuilders use, at times, take dosages of up to 100's of times more than their body naturally produces. But studies say leveling yourself to when you were 18, is very beneficial.

Dosage is a big key in this debate.

[A-Zo]

Steroids are bad for you, and there are side effects. However, if you learn which ones interact with your body, and know the proper dosage, than you can limit or at least prolong some of the more serious problems. They definitely do benefit you in many ways, but you need to be willing to deal with the risks as well.

I've never taken anything, but have been around enough different types. The big one now is HGH (Human Growth Hormon), it is perhaps the most effective. Then you have winny or winstrol, which will cut you up and help you lose weight. D-bol and test are also very popular and will help you put on size, but can be very detrimental to your health.

The funny thing about HGH, it will actually make your bones grow, and that's not always a good thing. The problem with the strengh you get from steroid, it's only muscular. It doesn't increase your tendons or ligaments as quickly. That's why you see so many injuries. Because your muscles can put more force than your bones and tendons/ligaments can handle, and you usually have a blow-out.

Overall, they are not worth it. Just put the time in and pray it's enough.

[J-Luck]

Steroids are bad for you, and there are side effects. However, if you learn which ones interact with your body, and know the proper dosage, than you can limit or at least prolong some of the more serious problems. They definitely do benefit you in many ways, but you need to be willing to deal with the risks as well.

I've never taken anything, but have been around enough different types. The big one now is HGH (Human Growth Hormon), it is perhaps the most effective. Then you have winny or winstrol, which will cut you up and help you lose weight. D-bol and test are also very popular and will help you put on size, but can be very detrimental to your health.

The funny thing about HGH, it will actually make your bones grow, and that's not always a good thing. The problem with the strengh you get from steroid, it's only muscular. It doesn't increase your tendons or ligaments as quickly. That's why you see so many injuries. Because your muscles can put more force than your bones and tendons/ligaments can handle, and you usually have a blow-out.

Overall, they are not worth it. Just put the time in and pray it's enough.

You did nothing to refute my point. It's not well known, but steroids in small to medium dosages are completely healthy for most guys.

I laughed when I saw how surprised Datline reporters were when they came to this conclusion. I had known for years.

[J-Luck]

Think about it. Some guys produce more HGH and testosterone than others. So if a 50 year old guy only produces 1/3 of both when compared with when he was 18(these numbers are merely to show a point, they aren't necessarily accurate), then why not take a small dosage, to replicated natural body production at 18. Or even 30.

It ONLY makes sense. You POTENTIALLY SEE some evidence of possible health damage that may be related to steroids(the research is shaky at best) when people take 100's of times more than they should.

As I previously stated, it's all about dosage.

[fozzy40]

The only time that steroid usage regardless of dose is when there is a deficiency. The main reason why studies can't definitively prove that steroids are unhealthy is the same reason why they can't say that smoking causes lung cancer. They ethically can't design a study to prove that it's harmful one way or another.

[DickHardman]

you guys should just ask matt blake about roids. he must know a lot about them considering he is a member of so many steroids forums.

[J-Luck]

The only time that steroid usage regardless of dose is when there is a deficiency. The main reason why studies can't definitively prove that steroids are unhealthy is the same reason why they can't say that smoking causes lung cancer. They ethically can't design a study to prove that it's harmful one way or another.

Wrong.

Roids are healthy, unless abused. Untill you can even begin to refute that, I'm not going to further defend my position. My previous statements will be repeated untill they are inadequate.

It's called case studies. Your point is completely irrelevant. You look at the people who engage in a behavior, or who consume/ingest the substance. That's why they HAVE PROVEN that smoking causes lung cancer. Besides, the science backs it up, on top of the studies done. The reason they can't link roids with any major health issues is because they're generally safe, unless in huge dosages. Even in huge dosages, they've had a HUGE problem likning roids to serious health issues.