9/11 a different perspective

[Thai Bri]

You have entered the nut case zone
Beyond this world
Strange things are known

Move the key
Unlock the door
Believe more bullshit
Than you have before....

Enter this world of conspiracy theories
Be like the hippies and asorted wierdies......




OK, acknowledgement to Rush.

[Garland]

you enter the nutcase zone.

that sounds painful.

[GonzoStyles]

I think there are a lot of possible explanations, easiest to conceive may be that the hijackers who died were misidentified from the start. I don't think there's any conspiracy behind it, though.

I think that there are actual legitimate elements to SOME of the questions posed about 9-11, ie all the purchasing of "put" options on airline stocks just before 9-11, the three israeli agents arrested on suspicion of being terrorists who were seen cheering as the towers burned, etc.

But I heard the two jack-asses who made this movie try to debate it with two writers from popular mechanics and the "Loose change" writers sounded like religious zealots, shouting them down, calling them liars and basically losing the arguements.

Idiots like these guys make any real look into 9-11 harder by spreading this kind of crap around. They went on and on about the "temperature required to melt steel" when in reality all that was needed was some stress on the loadbearing members to make them fail. While the two guys from popular science maintained their cool and made logical points.

I mean I find it hard to believe that we found a passport from one of the highjackers but no black boxes? But when you start talking about covert operations that involve fake planes, planted explosives and a conspiracy that would involve dozens if not hundreds of people, you enter the nutcase zone.

[DickHardman]

did you guys ever hear about how supposdely some of the 911 highjackers were found to be alive in other countries? i dont know how much truth there is to this, but its been featured in a few articles including a bbc one. what do you guys think?

check out this link

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm

is it just a really bad case of mistaken identity?

[gregimotis]

For those of us who don't want to sit for over two hours, can you summarize?

The government blew up the world trade center with explosives in the basement which is why they didn't topple.
The government also blew up the pentagon with a missle (because the fire was red instead of yellow). The missle hit the offices of the people who planned the World Trade Center in order to cover tracks.
The government hid the jetliners somewhere.
We didn't land on the moon, and there are aliens at area 51.

[IPON]

First, let me say that I am definitely not a conspiracy theorist, but I certainly don't dismiss logical information even if it’s not popular. I was sent this link and I must say it packed with research regarding the twin towers, pentagon and flight 93. I live and NYC and remember that Tuesday morning it was crazy. I think the worst part (or least said) was the smell. The smell traveled more than 100 blocks and lasted for weeks (every 20 NY blocks is ~1 mile). Anyway, I always had a problem with how the twin towers fell; it did not seem correct considering the damage. Now, in my (potential) ignorance, there were “expert” explanations for why the building collapsed as it did. I was fine with the explanations because they seemed “logical”. After watching this film I am questioning again.

For those interested this is a film about 129 minutes, time well spent IMHO. No conspiracy theories but very good research and the questions come from the research. If you believe the government is not wrong or should not be question or cannot be open minded. This will be a waste of your time. However, if you are open-minded this will certainly be a good discussion topic.

Click films, then loose change 2nd edition. Can see from Google or divix

http://www.loosechange911.com/