Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

William Cheung's Traditional Wing Chun

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hardball
    replied
    Originally posted by Tameo
    Boztepe did wrestling and boxing at the time and he just pushed william cheung over because william cheung doesnt even know how to stand properly. How can you throw an effective punch or strike if you cant even stand? none of the guys from my kung-fu school under Sifu joe sayah could stand properly. Now i see that after being humiliated by beginners in another wing chun lineage. No root at all in gm cheung's lineage. He doesn't understand the concept.
    Grandmaster William Chueng is damn NEAR 70 years old................................................................................................. ..........................................You outta talk with a little more respect.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tameo
    replied
    I already quit at that school a few weeks ago, now i train in a better wing chun lineage and some other stuff including some boxing

    Leave a comment:


  • Tameo
    replied
    Originally posted by seanyseanybean
    Hi

    This is a really cool thread. But i have a couple of questions.

    1, Earlier i saw someone mention Boztepe as a thai boxer who beat cheung, so i looked it up and it seems his main style is wing chun not muay thai?
    Plus he has a steven segal pony tail in some pics

    2, Whats the deal with Wing Chun then? I always thought there was no doubt that it one of the best SD systems around?? i'd never heard anybody dispute this until now so i'm a bit confused. Ive never studied it but i've always been impresses when i've seen it.

    3, How different are the different types of Wing Chun??
    Boztepe did wrestling and boxing at the time and he just pushed william cheung over because william cheung doesnt even know how to stand properly. How can you throw an effective punch or strike if you cant even stand? none of the guys from my kung-fu school under Sifu joe sayah could stand properly. Now i see that after being humiliated by beginners in another wing chun lineage. No root at all in gm cheung's lineage. He doesn't understand the concept.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hardball
    replied
    Originally posted by Tameo
    Was that the seminar at Sifu Eric Oram's school? I went to that dim mak seminar and all cheung did was demonstrate the same shit we do in class all the time. he just added a phoenix eye or digital thumb strike instead of a punch. He cant even explain anything correctly. This Sifu that comes down from Chicago to teach us gave a seminar were he is showing things and explaining in detail, correcting everyone and going in depth why you do things a certain way. If you do something wrong he corrects it right away. Its more like military style seminar. A lot more gets covered that way with more understanding. William cheung's seminar he shows a technique then you grab a partner and do it, but its really the same thing you do in class just a strike to the temple or like the back of the head.
    No, it was at Goh's gung fu in Baltimore but since I was cross training from JJJ I got more out of it than you probably did. If you take wing chun in class you should attend seminars from a different system. I don't go to jujitsu seminars because it's all old to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tameo
    replied
    Originally posted by Rogue Warrior
    Wing chun has many linear movements in the system. The entire time that I studied I never saw any thai kicks in it. I saw several kicks but none that went away from kicking from the center line of the body. There was if I remember correctly a kicking form called the 8 kicks. Im not going to go into in detail but there were no thai kicks involved. Also TRUE wing chun does not included any boxing movements. The WC system does treach a different style of punching that other styles do not. The chain punch is an effective training tool. You wouldnt use this punching method for every attack but it does teach one to develop fast, fast, fast hand speed that a true wing chun practicioner shows while in attack mode. But I wont defend WC through and through. Ive ssen verteran WC practioners get their ass kicked in a street fight. Which goes to show you that its not that art but the person that studies the art that makes it effective.
    A thai kick is not that hard to figure out. many kung- fu systems have that kick as well as other strikes found in mui thai. You cant categorise strikes as being either from this style or from that. A punch is a punch, a kick is a kick, a good punch can only be done certain ways , as can a kick.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tameo
    replied
    Originally posted by Hardball
    I love wing chun. It's a little complicated but I got to meet Grandmaster William Chueng in person at a chi sao/dim mak seminar. He is truly genuine and really in great physical shape. My Ex Sifu who is Part of G.M. Chueng's lineage is a true "Bad Ass"
    Was that the seminar at Sifu Eric Oram's school? I went to that dim mak seminar and all cheung did was demonstrate the same shit we do in class all the time. he just added a phoenix eye or digital thumb strike instead of a punch. He cant even explain anything correctly. This Sifu that comes down from Chicago to teach us gave a seminar were he is showing things and explaining in detail, correcting everyone and going in depth why you do things a certain way. If you do something wrong he corrects it right away. Its more like military style seminar. A lot more gets covered that way with more understanding. William cheung's seminar he shows a technique then you grab a partner and do it, but its really the same thing you do in class just a strike to the temple or like the back of the head.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tameo
    replied
    Originally posted by Hardball
    I love wing chun. It's a little complicated but I got to meet Grandmaster William Chueng in person at a chi sao/dim mak seminar. He is truly genuine and really in great physical shape. My Ex Sifu who is Part of G.M. Chueng's lineage is a true "Bad Ass"
    Why are you so fascinated with William cheung? he is not even sticky with his chi sao. all he has is speed, and there are a lot of faster people than him. His pressure point knowledge is limited, he doesn’t even strike the points correctly. Iv been with Sifu Joe Sayah for a little over 2 years and when i went against someone from the other lineage that I do right now i got pushed around like nothing by someone who has been going there only once a month for a year. Iv been training on average 5 hours a day for 2 years 6 days a week. I couldn’t do anything. After I was shown what I’m training now I made my mind up to quit what I was doing on the spot. The principles are just completely blow away William Cheung’s system. These guys did not even do any techniques on me! They just used their body to suffocate me. I couldn’t do any techniques because they did not give any room for them. That is true wing chun.

    Leave a comment:


  • Yu Law
    replied
    Originally posted by Rogue Warrior
    Now, now guys not all should knock on Wing Chun because of some asshole made a mockery of the system I studied wing chun from 1993-1998. Now I learned under master Ron heimberger during this time and his linage goes all the way up to yip man just like any other who has learned this art. But thats just it. Everyone says that there linage is right under yip man! My Sifi studied under yip ching who is one of yip man's sons. He Yip ching is now the grand master of wing chun in the states as well as in hong kong. Now learning this style really helped with my hand speed sooooo much. And as many fights as I got into while I served in the U.S. NAVY it saved my but. Now im not going to go on about how kick ass! wing chun is to all other arts. Not at all! after coming back home from serving my the USA then started taking Muay thai. and before I studied wing chun I studied kempo and tae kwon do. Now Im one to say that you should keep on learning and not just keep with one art. These days people are moving to MMA (mixed martial arts) instead of you conventional martial arts schools. Take it this way...If doctors only learned to work on one illness instead of many different types. Then the doctor would be useless. Being verse in several martial arts would make you a well rounded person...and a well rounded fighter.
    Well, i agree with u to some extent. It is always good to learn somethign new, and to know other lineages b/c ALL principles of martiral arts help each other.

    Doctors need to know how to apply a certain surgery to a certain operation. They need to work on each illness differently. Fighting is diff. b/c u DONT have time to diff. btw. what your attacker is. Illnesses need to be taken care of in certain ways, u can't fix a broken arm by using your knowledge of open heart surgery, but u can defeat an opponent by usign your knowledge of tae kwon doe if u r good enuff.

    It's true that every person fights diff. whether they are skilled or not, but is it always correct to wrestle a wrestler? Or how about kick with a muay thai guy? Being well versed in everything, means u r working on everything. Adaptation in fighting is not the same as in medicine. Even doctors sepcialize. There are foot doctors, heart surgeons, neural surgeons etc... B/c no one can be an expert in everything. Going to school we take multiple subjects, but MOST pple have favorite classes and by the time u hit Uni/college u have a major. It's good to have a well verse education, but focusing on 1 subject lets u concentrate all your efforts on thing.

    When someone trains in multiple arts, they're good at a lot of thigns, but they're not the best. U know Muay Thai, WIng Chun, Tae Kwon Doe, but since u have jumped aorund so much there have been multiple Wing CHun, Tae Kwon Doe and Muay Thai guys that have surpassed u.

    What i'm really tryign to say is that when you're in a fight u go back to instinct and what you've been training. If you've been training 10 diff. M.A.s what the hell r u gonna use? R u gonna use Karate b/c your opponent is in karate too? What if he's a black belt? Then your toast, b/c he has 1 thing in mind, to use his karate training to the fullest which is very skillful. On the other hand, someone who is training in wing chun, boxing and tae kwon doe will basically revert back to the art that they have practiced the most and r most comfortable with in a fight. So y not try a bunch of arts until u find one that fits u and train in it, b/c it is utterly useless, to know too many styles in a fight, b/c fights lasts seconds.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hardball
    replied
    I love wing chun. It's a little complicated but I got to meet Grandmaster William Chueng in person at a chi sao/dim mak seminar. He is truly genuine and really in great physical shape. My Ex Sifu who is Part of G.M. Chueng's lineage is a true "Bad Ass"
    Last edited by Hardball; 10-23-2005, 05:51 PM. Reason: spelling and grammar

    Leave a comment:


  • Rogue Warrior
    replied
    Wing chun has many linear movements in the system. The entire time that I studied I never saw any thai kicks in it. I saw several kicks but none that went away from kicking from the center line of the body. There was if I remember correctly a kicking form called the 8 kicks. Im not going to go into in detail but there were no thai kicks involved. Also TRUE wing chun does not included any boxing movements. The WC system does treach a different style of punching that other styles do not. The chain punch is an effective training tool. You wouldnt use this punching method for every attack but it does teach one to develop fast, fast, fast hand speed that a true wing chun practicioner shows while in attack mode. But I wont defend WC through and through. Ive ssen verteran WC practioners get their ass kicked in a street fight. Which goes to show you that its not that art but the person that studies the art that makes it effective.

    Leave a comment:


  • gabbah
    replied
    I have seen some Emin Bostepe instructional tapes, and to my eye it sucks as well. As far as I know he's a wing chun guy that pretends to be steven segal.
    And I have seen other instructional tapes with people who do the exact same sort of wing chun, and to me it's plain comedy. Almost everything of it is totally lame, unrealistic and weak.

    The wing chun Tameo is talking about doesn't sound anything like any of the wing chun I have seen. In fact, it sounds like kickboxing with added grappling or something. So I'm not sure why they call it wing chun. But it sounds ok at least.

    Leave a comment:


  • seanyseanybean
    replied
    Hi

    This is a really cool thread. But i have a couple of questions.

    1, Earlier i saw someone mention Boztepe as a thai boxer who beat cheung, so i looked it up and it seems his main style is wing chun not muay thai?
    Plus he has a steven segal pony tail in some pics

    2, Whats the deal with Wing Chun then? I always thought there was no doubt that it one of the best SD systems around?? i'd never heard anybody dispute this until now so i'm a bit confused. Ive never studied it but i've always been impresses when i've seen it.

    3, How different are the different types of Wing Chun??

    Leave a comment:


  • Tameo
    replied
    leung ting's wing chun is really shit in my opinion.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tameo
    replied
    A mui thai round kick is an effective way to deliver a strike, as is a heel kick. Good wing chun focuses on delivering the most powerfull strikes possible by performing them with the whole body behind them.

    Leave a comment:


  • gabbah
    replied
    Well that sounds a lot better than the wing chun I have seen in for example "Leung Ting's Dynamic Wing Chun", which just makes me rotfl...

    But as I understand it, no type of wing chun had thai kicks in the system to begin with... so now they have added it and pretend it's still wing chun or what? Isn't that like taking a lot of stuff from boxing and thaiboxing and taking credit for it by calling it wing chun? I don't get how these things work.

    I train in kickboxing, and it has western boxing and the kicks from muay thai, and as far as I know they are open about it. That is, when they created kickboxing, they said "ok, our style is boxing and muay thai kicks". So the credit still goes to boxing and muay thai in my opinion.
    If I'm wrong, and they DID try to take credit for the muay thai kicks, as if they invented them, they should be punished!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X