I don't know exactly... I'm told its Shaolin with heavy kick-boxing influence. It sounds kind of sketchy, but since I'm very happy with my training (except the lack of grappling) I doubt my sifu just "made it up". Also we enter all tournaments against other academies, so it must be sort of "legit", as legit as Shaolin Kung-Fu can get now-a-days.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why is Kung Fu not considered to be truly effective in actual combat?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Londo MolariI have been told by my Sifu that Kung-Fu means "to master something" while Wu-Shu means "Martial Art". So technically you could have Kung-Fu over cooking or driving! And if you have Kung-Fu over Wushu, then you are a fighter.
I have been taking Kung Fu for less than 8 months. So I'm not a master at all. Also, what I know about Kung Fu depends on where I train.
That being said, in my opinion there are two major "holes" or "weaknesses" in Kung Fu, which might be responsible for why we don't see Kung Fu practitioners in UCF or Boshido.
1) Although Kung Fu encourages you to develop ways to keep the off the ground, and keep your oponent away, if you somehow ARE forced down on the ground, Kung-Fu has little to offer in terms of joint-locks, grappling and ground fighting (again this is based on MY limited exposure to Kung Fu).
Kung Fu or CMA (chinese martial arts) has alot of grappling styles and techniques. You have some styles of CMA that are only ground fighting. These styles while rare and hard to find these days ,are still around. In Monkey Style kung fu you have a entire sub set devoted to ground fighting and ground fighting techniques.
Chin Na (Qin Na,Kum Na) is chinese joint locking,grappling, and throws.
Shuai Chiao is chines wrestling
All CMA styles have these elements in them ,some choose not to focus on then while others focus very little on them.
I agree that many CMA styles don't focus on grappling and ground fighting like they should ,but it's not the style that's lacking. It's the people that feel the ground and grappling are not important ,so they don't learn or teach that aspect of kung fu.
2) Most Kung Fu facilities do not have "no-holds-barred" fighting. I think the best way to become a good fighter is (unfortunately) experience. So if you learn to balance your self in hard stances, and can chop thru 10 pieces of cement, you still won't be comfortable in an actual fight. Many places have sparring with strict rules and protective equipment, and thats a good start, but that limits you from doing any open-handed techniques and it doesn't really feel "real". For example, in Judo, when you get flung around, or when you grapple, you learn to balance yourself when there is another ALIVE person trying to take you off-balance, which is far more practical and useful than balancing yourself on one toe for an hour, without facing any dynamic opposition.
No! it's not the my style is too dangerous to practice crap ppl say all the time. One reason is that many sifu give ppl what they want. Most ppl come in want some training and a belt/sash and are happy. Is that right? HELL NO!! ,but if they did'nt many could'nt afford a living.
The next reason is that it's just recent that so many ppl have been willing to do the type of training that you see done in MMA and Bjj schools. That is still a low percentage when it comes to the total number of ppl learning martial arts. Most ppl just don't want to work that hard so they go to schools where they don't have to.
How many ppl are going to pay money to sit in horse stance for the first 3-6 months of their training? Very few!! People want to do what they see done in kung fu movies ,they don't want to spend the time going through the basics. Also people see the movies and think kung fu is flashy and fun. It's not!! It's alot of hard work ,and takes time to perfect. As the times change i think you're going to see kung fu schools go back to the old school methods. It just takes time like it took people time to come back to grappling. Grappling is nothing new ,but when strikers were able to defeat them with ease ppl changed to striking. It's a continueous circle.
So the reason we see people from other non-KungFu martial arts in Championships is that Kung-Fu is not very focused on down and dirty struggling, and even after achieving a black belt, a practitioner might find himself inadequately prepared to fight all-out.
That fact is that just like on forums and chat rooms. People are not always what they claim to be. Yeah there are some ppl in those early events that got their butts handed to them by MMA and BJJ people. But in most of those fights the winner was just plain better prepared ,and a better fighter. The style had very little to do with it. Then like i said not many strikers trained to fight grapplers the prepared for other strikers.
In today's UFC/Pride/NHB fights no one with just one style of training is going to survive. These guys are trained pros they use a lot of speciallized training. You don't see BJJ ppl running these fights anymore because things evolve. You need the stand up and the ground work. One without the other is not going to get it.
jeff
Comment
-
Hey!! Thanks for your reply!
My priorities now are to identify CMAs that show you how to keep the fight off the ground...or how to fight on the ground... otherwise I'll have to take ju-jitsu after i'm done with kung-fu.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Londo MolariHey!! Thanks for your reply!
My priorities now are to identify CMAs that show you how to keep the fight off the ground...or how to fight on the ground... otherwise I'll have to take ju-jitsu after i'm done with kung-fu.
To be honest ,it's alot easier for an experienced grappler to take you down ,than for you to avoid being taken down. While you can learn different anti-grappling takedown techniques ,you still need to understand your techniques enough ,to know what you can and can not use while on the ground.
Just because a striker goes to the ground ,it does not mean he can't strike from that postion. I use to wrestle and do roll with MMA and Bjj ppl ,so i have some experience with the ground and submissions,sweeps,guard etc...
My sifu has only done kung fu his entire life ,and has no problem handling himself from the ground. When you know your body and the principles,concepts,and therioes of fighting ,it does'nt matter where you fight from ,you'll be effective.
jeff
Comment
-
Originally posted by sherwincWu-Shu means "Combined Art"
Sorry but I know a few chinese/japanese characters and Wu is the same character as Bu in jjapanese, the Bu from Budo or Bu jitsu
Actually Wu shu reads the same as Bu jitsu so it is Martial Art
So nice try but here you are..... WRONG!
see www.yijiaowushu.com/sliced_images/wu-shu.gif for the characters
Comment
-
I don't think kung fu translates well to ring sport for several reasons.The fact that a lot of open hand tech. cannot be used with gloves.A lot of kung fu is not a visually spectacular sport i.e combos are often to fast to see and therefore wont score correctly.And there is not a well established tournament culture in kung fu.(So students are not often exposed to tournaments) Also K.F is more focussed on effective tech. rather than what looks good or what works well in competition.(Often what works well for tournaments will be next to useless in an actual fight.)
So it is because of this lack of tournament exposure that people believe K.F to be inneffective in actual combat.IMHO
Comment
-
Originally posted by Toudiyama[NL]Sorry but I know a few chinese/japanese characters and Wu is the same character as Bu in jjapanese, the Bu from Budo or Bu jitsu
Actually Wu shu reads the same as Bu jitsu so it is Martial Art
So nice try but here you are..... WRONG!
see www.yijiaowushu.com/sliced_images/wu-shu.gif for the characters
COMBINATION = combined = Combined Art = WuShu = combination of all flowery/acrobatic movements art
Note:
Speaking of FOOD....
When it comes to a Party, plenty of Food, since you are late, the only food for you is LEFT OVERS........
so.... WuShu is like those of "Left Over Food" .... since good kungfu's is not found in China
Comment
-
Originally posted by jmd161Kung Fu means skill aquired in ,so yes you can have kung fu in cooking=chef kung fu in many things. Wu Shu means War Art ,but it's known as the performance based stuff that Jet Li and Jackie Chan does.
I thought Jet Li is one of the Examples of a WUSHU- emphasize more on Northern KungFu
Note:
with acrobatic, purely using of Feet Attacks
while Bruce Lee and Jacky Chan is one of the Examples of a KUNGFU - emphasize more on Southern KungFu
Note:
no acrobatic, purely using of Hand Attacks
Originally posted by jmd161Very smart answer!
There are alot more than two ,but this is YOUR opinion.
Well, since i have a little more experience in Chinese martial arts ,i'll reply to this.
Kung Fu or CMA (chinese martial arts) has alot of grappling styles and techniques. You have some styles of CMA that are only ground fighting. These styles while rare and hard to find these days ,are still around. In Monkey Style kung fu you have a entire sub set devoted to ground fighting and ground fighting techniques.
Chin Na (Qin Na,Kum Na) is chinese joint locking,grappling, and throws.
Shuai Chiao is chines wrestling
All CMA styles have these elements in them ,some choose not to focus on then while others focus very little on them.
I agree that many CMA styles don't focus on grappling and ground fighting like they should ,but it's not the style that's lacking. It's the people that feel the ground and grappling are not important ,so they don't learn or teach that aspect of kung fu.
I agree with you pretty much here ,but there are reasons why most kung fu schools operate this way.
No! it's not the my style is too dangerous to practice crap ppl say all the time. One reason is that many sifu give ppl what they want. Most ppl come in want some training and a belt/sash and are happy. Is that right? HELL NO!! ,but if they did'nt many could'nt afford a living.
The next reason is that it's just recent that so many ppl have been willing to do the type of training that you see done in MMA and Bjj schools. That is still a low percentage when it comes to the total number of ppl learning martial arts. Most ppl just don't want to work that hard so they go to schools where they don't have to.
This is quote is a good example of a true Non-Commercialized KungFu
Originally posted by jmd161How many ppl are going to pay money to sit in horse stance for the first 3-6 months of their training? Very few!! People want to do what they see done in kung fu movies ,they don't want to spend the time going through the basics. Also people see the movies and think kung fu is flashy and fun. It's not!! It's alot of hard work ,and takes time to perfect. As the times change i think you're going to see kung fu schools go back to the old school methods. It just takes time like it took people time to come back to grappling. Grappling is nothing new ,but when strikers were able to defeat them with ease ppl changed to striking. It's a continueous circle.
jeff
for us, we have no exercise like body conditioning, neck twisting, side bending, jogging, skipping rope, we have not that kind of exercise.....
we do Horse Riding Stance starting from 5minutes up to 12minutes.....
then we do Knuckle Push-up (push-up position only) from 6minutes and so on.....
we do training for almost 10 years of practice.....
push-up positions and horse riding stance then towel for sweat glands, then the kungfu drills and weaponry and sparring.....
Note:
if you cannot resist Horse riding stance and Push-up position (majority they last for 7 days then they stop training kungfu and switch to another club) you better not a candidate to learn kungfu
Comment
-
Originally posted by guy incognitoI don't think kung fu translates well to ring sport for several reasons.The fact that a lot of open hand tech. cannot be used with gloves.A lot of kung fu is not a visually spectacular sport i.e combos are often to fast to see and therefore wont score correctly.And there is not a well established tournament culture in kung fu.(So students are not often exposed to tournaments) Also K.F is more focussed on effective tech. rather than what looks good or what works well in competition.(Often what works well for tournaments will be next to useless in an actual fight.)
So it is because of this lack of tournament exposure that people believe K.F to be inneffective in actual combat.IMHO
and most of the kungfu hand attacks is all foul to the referree's decision....
Comment
-
Originally posted by sherwincI thought Jet Li is one of the Examples of a WUSHU- emphasize more on Northern KungFu
Note:
with acrobatic, purely using of Feet Attacks
while Bruce Lee and Jacky Chan is one of the Examples of a KUNGFU - emphasize more on Southern KungFu
Note:
no acrobatic, purely using of Hand Attacks
Comment
-
Originally posted by Toudiyama[NL]Well actually Jackie Chan is a product of the chinese opera hence the acrobatics and outragious stunts he does himself
if we won't include the acrobatics and outragioius stunts of Jackie Chan, then most of his KungFu is all Southern KungFu category which means - very far to call it WuShu.......
Comment
-
Originally posted by sherwincif we won't include the acrobatics and outragioius stunts of Jackie Chan, then most of his KungFu is all Southern KungFu category which means - very far to call it WuShu.......
I do not know what MA they teach at the opera
Comment
-
Originally posted by guy incognitoI think jakie knows ellements of both northern and southern KF systems.
Note:
since southern KungFu uses mostly prioritizing hand attacks rather than feet
Bruce Lee's KungFu mostly is Southern KungFu
The Wong Fei Hung of Jet Lee is a good example of a Northern KungFu
Comment
Comment