Wing Chunner vs Boxer

[mellow]

Actually I've been quite consistant; I objected to the idea that a blow to something called "CV17" or in fact any where on the body was lethal.

There are other places that you can hit that can cause debilitating injury up to death. One of them is expressly illegal in boxing. See if you can figure it out, Teddy (Altas).

I've made it clear why I don't think

I agree with that.

Now you're just attacking me personally

Poor little you. .

[Sagacious Lu]

There are other places that you can hit that can cause debilitating injury up to death. One of them is expressly illegal in boxing. See if you can figure it out, Teddy (Altas).

Then you are done talking about CV17? All you had to defend that was the guys shooting pigs with baseballs and the illegal fight back in 1906? Okay. Moving on, you're the one defending death strikes so the onus is on you to explain what you're talking about. In case you didn't realize it that's how logical discussions go; you can't make a claim and expect the other person to back it up for you, you have to do it for yourself. Just a tip.

[mellow]

Then you are done talking about CV17? All you had to defend that was the guys shooting pigs with baseballs and the illegal fight back in 1906? Okay. Moving on, you're the one defending death strikes so the onus is on you to explain what you're talking about. In case you didn't realize it that's how logical discussions go; you can't make a claim and expect the other person to back it up for you, you have to do it for yourself. Just a tip.

Nope, you made the claims first. U said

I don't know where that is, but I do know that there isn't anywhere that you can expect to kill a person with a single unarmed strike.

and

I'd at least agree that that's a viable body blow. I don't see how it's "deadly" though; it's a perfectly legal target in boxing, kick boxing, MMA, san shou etc.

and

it's obvious that you can't kill someone by punching them in the chest.

I simply showed you that yes, it's feasible to die from even a mediocre blow to the chest. I've posted articles giving both experimental and anecdoctal evidence. What evidence have you offered other than your own opinion?

But I shouldn't be surprised. What more should one expect from someone who's strategy when facing an armed attacker is to bend over a take it in the booty

P.S. you figure out the question yet there Gus D'amato??

[TTEscrima]

Nope, you made the claims first. U said

andand

I simply showed you that yes, it's feasible to die from even a mediocre blow to the chest. I've posted articles giving both experimental and anecdoctal evidence. What evidence have you offered other than your own opinion?

But I shouldn't be surprised. What more should one expect from someone who's strategy when facing an armed attacker is to bend over a take it in the booty

P.S. you figure out the question yet there Gus D'amato??

Dammit man it won't let me rep you. And how dare you cite injuries that occurred during an "illegal" fight.

[Sagacious Lu]

showed you that yes, it's feasible to die from even a mediocre blow to the chest. I've posted articles giving both experimental and anecdoctal evidence. What evidence have you offered other than your own opinion?

Actually, the articles YOU posted did a great job of illustrating my point.

But I shouldn't be surprised. What more should one expect from someone who's strategy when facing an armed attacker is to bend over a take it in the booty

You must have me confused with something you saw on one of your gay porn sites

[Sagacious Lu]

Dammit man it won't let me rep you.

That's interesting, because I know you're either Boarspear or one of his buddies, and Boar agrees completely with this statement:

...I do know that there isn't anywhere that you can expect to kill a person with a single unarmed strike.

He said so right here:

Dont expect ANYTHING emptyhanded to finish an opponent, people survive gunshots, parachute malfunctions and airplane crashes

Do you disagree with Boar or do you just care more about WHO made a statement then what the statement actually says?

[jubaji]

Do you disagree with Boar or do you just care more about WHO made a statement then what the statement actually says?

All he really cares about (just like Boaring did) is what will be most soothing to his widdle ego.

[mellow]

You must have me confused with something you saw on one of your gay porn sites

Nah, it's in reference to the thread that culminated in this gem here

No, but I am saying that if they're facing a rapist with a weapon they have to decide whether it's worth their life to fight back. Whether it is or not is a personal question that's up to each individual to make. Most rapes aren't also murders...

You really endeared yourself to the women who visit this site!

[mellow]

Actually, the articles YOU posted did a great job of illustrating my point.

Really? Well, point out where in any of the articles it says "taking a shot to the chest is completely harmless. . . "

[mellow]

That's interesting, because I know you're either Boarspear or one of his buddies, and Boar agrees completely with this statement:

...I do know that there isn't anywhere that you can expect to kill a person with a single unarmed strike.

He said so right here:

Originally Posted by BoarSpear
Dont expect ANYTHING emptyhanded to finish an opponent, people survive gunshots, parachute malfunctions and airplane crashes

Do you disagree with Boar or do you just care more about WHO made a statement then what the statement actually says?

There is go, leapfrogging to conclusions again, Froggie.

Please point out ANYWHERE I said you can expect to kill a person with a single unarmed strike?

Reading comprehension seems to be very difficult for you. Perhaps you should just concentrate on training you 1-2 combo

[Sagacious Lu]

Really? Well, point out where in any of the articles it says "taking a shot to the chest is completely harmless. . . "

Point out for me where I said it was completely harmless

[Sagacious Lu]

Please point out ANYWHERE I said you can expect to kill a person with a single unarmed strike?

Then you DO agree with me? You can't have it both ways...

[USArmyBJJ]

Sagacious Liu and Mellow,

It really seems like you two are largely agreeing with one another. You both seem to be saying that it is possible to die with one strike, but not likely. I could be wrong, but this seems to be what both of you are getting at, and it seems to be the most reasonable position once you get beyond your egos.

[Sagacious Lu]

Sagacious Liu and Mellow,

It really seems like you two are largely agreeing with one another. You both seem to be saying that it is possible to die with one strike, but not likely. I could be wrong, but this seems to be what both of you are getting at, and it seems to be the most reasonable position once you get beyond your egos.

If it were MY ego that was a problem I'd be cracking homophobic jokes about Mellow.

[USArmyBJJ]

If it were MY ego that was a problem I'd be cracking homophobic jokes about Mellow.

Don't take what I said as a personal insult to you. But it does seem that, often people exaggerate the differences between them and others because their egos get in the way of seeing the common ground.

Do you agree with my statement, though? That a one-hit kill is possible, but not likely?