Originally posted by jubaji
I think we can agree that which is the 'tougher' weight class will depend entirely on who is there, right? Kinda hard to generalize about that without the requisite information.
I think we can agree that which is the 'tougher' weight class will depend entirely on who is there, right? Kinda hard to generalize about that without the requisite information.
As far as malnourishment, it isn't too harsh. Here is an example of how I think: he says he's fairly thin and 130 lbs. If he has 8-10% body fat, and he burns five or more pounds, that leaves him with rougly 5 to 7% bodyfat left. It is not recommended to have under 8% bodyfat, because it is unhealthy. You need a BF of 2% just to survive, and 12% is the athletic level. 12-8% are optimal level of BF and anything lower could possibly be unhealthy. Women actually lose their menstral cycle usually under 12% BF, I know he's not a woman, it's just an example. So, from my point of view, unless he has extra pudge he can get rid of, cutting weight is not a good idea, especially if he is not experienced with nutrition.
I can see where you are coming from, but this is where I am coming from.
Yeah, I would agree on what weight class the competition will be in at his school depending on who is there, but not against opponent schools. In general there are weight classes that are more populated than the others.
)
). Well here are my latest problems:
Well thanks for all the tips everyone, they helped alot. Oh and jubaji, these guys are ranging form sophomores to seniors(112-260 pounds). Peace.
Leave a comment: